Abdul Sami v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 7(3), Jaipur
[Citation -2016-LL-1020-37]

Citation 2016-LL-1020-37
Appellant Name Abdul Sami
Respondent Name Income-tax Officer, Ward 7(3), Jaipur
Court ITAT-Jaipur
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/10/2016
Assessment Year 2008-09
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee has filed appeal on 15/6/2016 against the order of the ld. CIT(A), which has been numbered as ITA No. 663/JP/2016 and due to inadvertent mistake, the appeal was again filed on 13/7/2016, which was number as 2 ITA 709/JP/2016 Abdul Sami Vs ITO ITA No. 719/JP/2016. Thus, the appeal has been filed twice against the order of the ld. CIT(A) and he prayed that this appeal i.e. ITA NO. 709/JP/2016 may be treated as withdrawn. After hearing the revenue, the assessee was allowed to withdraw his appeal. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 709/JP/2016 Assessment Year : 2008-09 Abdul Sami, cuke Income Tax Officer, H.No. 1842, Naheron Ki Nadi Vs. Ward 7(3), Chokdi Ramchandra Ji Ki, Jaipur. Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. PAN/GIR No.: ANPPS 5802 Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Shravan Gupta (Adv.) Revenue by : Shri R.A. Verma (Addl. CIT) Date of Hearing : 19/10/2016 Date of Pronouncement : 20/10/2016 ORDER PER: BHAGCHAND, A.M. This is appeal filed by assessee against order dated 29/04/2016 passed by ld CIT(A)-3, Jaipur for A.Y. 2008-09. 2. At outset, ld. AR of assessee has submitted that assessee has filed appeal on 15/6/2016 against order of ld. CIT(A), which has been numbered as ITA No. 663/JP/2016 and due to inadvertent mistake, appeal was again filed on 13/7/2016, which was number as 2 ITA 709/JP/2016_ Abdul Sami Vs ITO ITA No. 719/JP/2016. Thus, appeal has been filed twice against order of ld. CIT(A) and he prayed that this appeal i.e. ITA NO. 709/JP/2016 may be treated as withdrawn. 3. After hearing revenue, assessee was allowed to withdraw his appeal. Hence, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In result, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 20/10/2016. Sd/- (BHAGCHAND) Accountant Member Jaipur Dated:- 20th October, 2016 Copy of order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Shri Abdul Sami, Jaipur. 2. Respondent- ITO, Ward 7(3), Jaipur. 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 709/JP/2016) By order, Asst. Registrar Abdul Sami v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 7(3), Jaipur
Report Error