Sanjay Kumar v. ACIT, Circle-3, Noida
[Citation -2016-LL-1019-49]

Citation 2016-LL-1019-49
Appellant Name Sanjay Kumar
Respondent Name ACIT, Circle-3, Noida
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/10/2016
Assessment Year 2010-11
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags time barred • dismissing the appeal in limine
Bot Summary: In this case the Notice was sent to the Assessee for hearing by Regd. AD Post for today i.e. 19.10.2016 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10, but neither the assessee nor his Authorised Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any application for adjournment. It is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of his appeal in my considered opinion, no useful purpose would be served to send the notice again and again on the same address. Even otherwise, the present Appeal is time barred by 21 days which has not been condoned by the Bench till date. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 and Hon ble Madhya Pradesh High Court s decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480, I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same. We would like to clarify that subsequently if the assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the appeal. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.


IN INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-3 : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 4008/Del/2016 A.Y. : 2010-11 MR. SANJAY KUMAR, VS. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, B-178, GAMMA-01, GREATER NOIDA A-2D, SECTOR-24, UTTAR PRADESH NOIDA-201301 (PAN: AADPPK1373E) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Department by : Smt. F.R. Meena, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 19-10-2016 Date of Order : 19-10-2016 ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal is filed by Assessee is directed against Order dated 31.3.2016 of Ld. CIT(A)-I, Noida relevant to assessment year 2010-11. 2. In this case Notice was sent to Assessee for hearing by Regd. AD Post for today i.e. 19.10.2016 at address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10, but neither assessee nor his Authorised Representative attended hearing and also not filed any application for adjournment. It is thus inferred that assessee is not interested in prosecution of his appeal, therefore, in my considered opinion, no useful purpose would be served to send notice again and again on same address. Even otherwise, present Appeal is time barred by 21 days which has not been condoned by Bench till date. Page 1 of 3 3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon ble Madhya Pradesh High Court s decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss same. We would like to clarify that subsequently if assessee explains reasons for non appearance and if Bench is so satisfied, matter may be recalled for purpose of adjudication of appeal. 4. In result, Appeal of assessee is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in Open Court on 19-10-2016. SD/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:19/10/2016 SRBhatnagar Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY By Order, Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3 Sanjay Kumar v. ACIT, Circle-3, Noida
Report Error