Inshan Buildwell Pvt.Ltd. v. ITO, Ward-11(4), New Delhi
[Citation -2016-LL-1017-32]

Citation 2016-LL-1017-32
Appellant Name Inshan Buildwell Pvt.Ltd.
Respondent Name ITO, Ward-11(4), New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/10/2016
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags opportunity of being heard • reasonable opportunity • speaking order • nil income
Bot Summary: On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and in law, in passing the order without giving assessee an opportunity of being heard, in clear violation of the principle of natural justice. The relevant facts of the case are that the AO vide his order u/s 147/143(3) considering the fact that the assessee had declared a NIL income concluded the assessment at an income of Rs.9,02,250/- by making an addition u/s 68. Aggrieved the assessee came in appeal before the First Appellate Authority, assailing the addition made on merit as well as questioning the jurisdiction of the AO to pass the order. The CIT(A) gave a final opportunity to the assessee to appear on 16.03.2015. Sustained the addition made by the AO. Aggrieved by this, the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. 3. The Ld.AR inviting attention to the impugned order requested that the opportunity of being heard may be granted to the assessee. Accordingly, considering the material available on record, I find that in the light of the submissions of the parties before the Bench, it would be appropriate to set aside the issue back to the CIT(A) with the direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC-3 NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .No.-2638/Del/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2005-06) Inshan Buildwell Pvt.Ltd., vs ITO, G-177, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. Ward-11(4), PAN-AABCI3421R New Delhi. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh.Kapil Goel, Adv. Respondent by Ms.Anima Barnwal, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 21.07.2016 Date of Pronouncement 17.10.2016 ORDER present appeal has been filed by assessee assailing correctness of order dated 17.03.2015 of CIT(A)-15, Delhi pertaining to 2005-06 assessment year. Both parties were heard only in respect to Ground No.2 which reads as under:- 2. On facts and circumstances of case, learned CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and in law, in passing order without giving assessee opportunity of being heard, in clear violation of principle of natural justice. 2. relevant facts of case are that AO vide his order u/s 147/143(3) considering fact that assessee had declared NIL income concluded assessment at income of Rs.9,02,250/- by making addition u/s 68. Aggrieved assessee came in appeal before First Appellate Authority, assailing addition made on merit as well as questioning jurisdiction of AO to pass order. record shows that before CIT(A) assessee sought adjournments however failed to advance any arguments in support of grounds raised. CIT(A) gave final opportunity to assessee to appear on 16.03.2015. However, on said date neither any adjournment was moved nor any one appeared. In these circumstances, CIT(A) relying upon CIT vs NR I.T.A .No.-2638/Del/2015 Portfolio P.Ltd. sustained addition made by AO. Aggrieved by this, assessee is in appeal before ITAT. 3. Ld.AR inviting attention to impugned order requested that opportunity of being heard may be granted to assessee. It was his submission that he was not in position to state as to why on said date, assessee was not represented. However, assessee, it was submitted is serious in pursuing appeal filed. It was submitted that in eventuality, issues are set aside for granting opportunity to assessee, he gave his personal undertaking that assessee shall participate in proceedings fully. Considering undertaking given Ld. Sr. DR did not object to prayer of counsel. 4. Accordingly, considering material available on record, I find that in light of submissions of parties before Bench, it would be appropriate to set aside issue back to CIT(A) with direction to pass speaking order in accordance with law after giving assessee reasonable opportunity of being heard. It is hoped that opportunity so provided to assessee is utilized by participating fully and fairly before CIT(A). It is made clear that incase opportunity so provided in good faith is abused, Ld. CIT(A) would be at liberty to pass speaking order in accordance with law on basis of material available on record. 5. In result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. order is pronounced in open court on 17th October, 2016. Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER Amit Kumar Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2 Inshan Buildwell Pvt.Ltd. v. ITO, Ward-11(4), New Delhi
Report Error