Income-tax Officer, Ward 18(1)(2), Mumbai v. Arun D. Tejuja
[Citation -2016-LL-1003-42]

Citation 2016-LL-1003-42
Appellant Name Income-tax Officer, Ward 18(1)(2), Mumbai
Respondent Name Arun D. Tejuja
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/10/2016
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: D.R. submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs. 10 lacs and the CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 is applicable to this appeal and the appeal is not maintainable/not pressed in terms of CBDT circular no 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015. 142/2007-ITJ 2 ITA 5914/Mum/2013 dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, no appeal shall be filed by the Revenue in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3 of the circular Para 3 of the Circular No. 21/2015 S No. Appeals in Income tax Monetary Limit matters 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- In the said circular vide para 10, it is stipulated that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in may be withdrawn/not pressed. Keeping in view the CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 which is applicable from retrospective effect and is also applicable to pending appeals and also in view of ld. DR stating before us that this appeal is now not maintainable/not pressed in view of the above CBDT Circular, we hold that this appeal filed by the Revenue which is covered by this order involving tax effect less than Rs. 10 lacs is not maintainable and is dismissed being not pressed. The Revenue is at liberty to file an application for recall of this appeal in accordance with law, if at any stage the Revenue wants to agitate the matter in accordance with the provisions/clauses as contained in the afore-stated circular. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.


A IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./I.T.A. No. 5914/ Mum/2013 ( [ [ / Assessment Year : 2005-06) Income Tax Officer, / Shri Aru n D. Tejuja Ward 18(1)(2) 17, Rishike sh Co-op. v. Mumbai Housing Socie ty, Plot No. 63, Worli Hill Road, Worli, Mumbai-400018 . /PAN : AAEPT6984C ( /Appellant) .. ( / Respondent) Revenue by Mr. Vikash Kumar Agarwal Assessee by : Mr. Dinesh H Hariya / Date of Hearing : 03-10-2016 /Date of Pronouncement : 03-10-2016 / O R D E R PER RAMIT KOCHAR,ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : This appeal filed by Revenue is disposed of because tax effect in appeal is less than Rs. 10 lacs as per latest CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, F. No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 2. ld. D.R. submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs. 10 lacs and CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 is applicable to this appeal and appeal is not maintainable/not pressed in terms of CBDT circular no 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015. ld. DR submitted that as per latest CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, F. No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) 2 ITA 5914/Mum/2013 dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, no appeal shall be filed by Revenue in respect of assessment year or years in which tax effect is less than monetary limit specified in para 3 of circular Para 3 of Circular No. 21/2015 S No. Appeals in Income tax Monetary Limit matters (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- In said circular vide para 10, it is stipulated that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below specified tax limits in may be withdrawn/not pressed. 3. Keeping in view CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 which is applicable from retrospective effect and is also applicable to pending appeals and also in view of ld. DR stating before us that this appeal is now not maintainable/not pressed in view of above CBDT Circular, we hold that this appeal filed by Revenue which is covered by this order involving tax effect less than Rs. 10 lacs is not maintainable and is dismissed being not pressed. However, Revenue is at liberty to file application for recall of this appeal in accordance with law, if at any stage Revenue wants to agitate matter in accordance with provisions/clauses as contained in afore-stated circular. We order accordingly. 4. In result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on 03rd October 2016. 3 ITA 5914/Mum/2013 03-10-2016 Sd/- sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (RAMIT KOCHAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 03-10-2016 [ /Copy of Order forwarded to : 1. / Appellant 2. / Respondent. 3. ( ) / CIT(A)- concerned, Mumbai 4. / CIT- Concerned, Mumbai 5. , , / DR, ITAT, Mumbai Bench 6. [ / Guard file. / BY ORDER, //True Copy// / (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) , / ITAT, Mumbai Income-tax Officer, Ward 18(1)(2), Mumbai v. Arun D. Tejuja
Report Error