ITO, Ward-1, Rewari v. Gaurav Goyal
[Citation -2016-LL-0926-79]

Citation 2016-LL-0926-79
Appellant Name ITO, Ward-1, Rewari
Respondent Name Gaurav Goyal
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 26/09/2016
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: Admittedly the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.10 lakhs. Read with S.268 A of the Income Tax Act 1961, this appeal by the Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not have been pressed by the Revenue. In view of the above the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limine. In the result the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26th September, 2016.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-3, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5419/Del/2015 AY: 2011-12 ITO, Ward 1, Model Town vs. Sh. Gaurav Goyal Rewari 123 401 Prop. M/s Stone Park International 44, New Anaj Mandi Rewari PAN: AGTPG 7367 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr.D.R Respondent by : None. ORDER This appeal is filed by Revenue. Admittedly tax effect in present appeal is less than Rs.10 lakhs. 1.1. In terms of CBDT Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December,2015, F.No. 279/Misc./142/2007-ITJ(Pt.) read with S.268 of Income Tax Act 1961, this appeal by Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not have been pressed by Revenue. 2. In view of above appeal by Revenue is dismissed in limine. 3. In result appeal by Revenue is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in Open Court on 26th September, 2016. Sd/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 26th September, 2016 Manga 2 Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT - TRUE COPY - By Order, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITO, Ward-1, Rewari v. Gaurav Goyal
Report Error