ITO, Ward-39(5), New Delhi v. Inderjit Singh Chadha, HUF - 2016-LL-0926-78

Citation	2016-LL-0926-78
Appellant Name	ITO, Ward-39(5), New Delhi
Respondent Name	Inderjit Singh Chadha, HUF
Court	ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	26/09/2016
Assessment Year	2010-11
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	tax effect
Bot Summary:	Admittedly the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.10 lakhs. Read with S.268 A of the Income Tax Act 1961, this appeal by the Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not have been pressed by the Revenue. In view of the above the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limine. In the result the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26th September, 2016.

IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-3 , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5309/Del/2015 AY: 2010-11 ITO, Ward 39(5) vs. Inderjit Singh Chadha, HUF Room no.1007 BG 314, Sanjay Gandhi Transport Ngr 10th floor, E 2, Block Delhi 110 042 Civic Centre New Delhi Pan: AAAGI 4671 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr.D.R Respondent by : None ORDER This appeal is filed by Revenue. Admittedly tax effect in present appeal is less than Rs.10 lakhs. 1.1. In terms of CBDT Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December,2015, F.No. 279/Misc./142/2007-ITJ(Pt.) read with S.268 of Income Tax Act 1961, this appeal by Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not have been pressed by Revenue. 2. In view of above appeal by Revenue is dismissed in limine. 3. In result appeal by Revenue is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in Open Court on 26th September, 2016. Sd/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 26th September, 2016 Manga 2 Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT - TRUE COPY - By Order, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITO, Ward-39(5), New Delhi v. Inderjit Singh Chadha, HUF

Metadata

Judgment