Indrajeet Zandusingh Tomar v. ITO, Ward-9(2), Surat
[Citation -2016-LL-0923-69]

Citation 2016-LL-0923-69
Appellant Name Indrajeet Zandusingh Tomar
Respondent Name ITO, Ward-9(2), Surat
Court ITAT-Ahmedabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/09/2016
Assessment Year 2008-09
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags application for adjournment • dismissing the appeal in limine
Bot Summary: CIT(A)-V Surast dated 15.10.2013 for the Asstt. At the time of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice. Assessee has not filed any application for adjournment of the case. Thus, it appears that the assessee is not serious in pursuing with its appeal, and therefore, by following the decision of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in CIT Vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine for want of prosecution.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.22/Ahd/2014 Asstt. Year: 2008-2009 Indrajeet Zandusingh Tomar ITO, Ward-9(2) R-102, Rohit AC Market Vs Surat. Ring Road Surat 395 002. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri James Kurian, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 23/09/2016 Date of Pronouncement: 23/09/2016 ORDER PER AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Assessee is in appeal before us against order of ld.CIT(A)-V Surast dated 15.10.2013 for Asstt. Year 2008-09. 2. At time of hearing none appeared on behalf of assessee despite service of notice. Assessee has not filed any application for adjournment of case. Thus, it appears that assessee is not serious in pursuing with its appeal, and therefore, by following decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench in CIT Vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Delhi), we dismiss appeal of assessee in limine for want of prosecution. 3. In result, appeal assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in Court on 23rd September, 2016 at Ahmedabad. Sd/- Sd/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (AMARJIT SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 23 /09/2016 Indrajeet Zandusingh Tomar v. ITO, Ward-9(2), Surat
Report Error