Gujarat Hydrocarbons & Power Sez Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-57 (TDS), Kolkata
[Citation -2016-LL-0923-64]

Citation 2016-LL-0923-64
Appellant Name Gujarat Hydrocarbons & Power Sez Limited
Respondent Name Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-57 (TDS), Kolkata
Court ITAT-Kolkata
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/09/2016
Assessment Year 2009-10
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags mistake apparent from record
Bot Summary: CIT, Sr. D.R., for the Department Date of concluding the hearing : September 23, 2016 Date of pronouncing the order : September 23, 2016 O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap : By this Miscellaneous Application, the assessee is seeking rectification of the mistakes alleged to have crept in the order of the Tribunal dated 13.04.2015 passed in ITA No. 153/KOL/2012. We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. Counsel for the assessee, the appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No. 153/KOL/2012 has been disposed of by the Tribunal vide its order dated 13.04.2015 without taking into consideration the decision of the Hon ble M. A. N o. 8 9 / KO L / 2 0 1 6 Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 2 of 3 Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs.- Prakausali Investments India Pvt. Limited as well as the decision of the Mumbai Bench of ITAT in the case of ITO vs.- Jet Airways India Limited 28 ITR 582 and sub-Rule of Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, which were cited on behalf of the assessee and this position clearly evident from the record has not been disputed even by the ld. D.R. has also not disputed the stand of the assessee that such non-consideration of the relevant judicial pronouncements and Rule has given rise to a mistake apparent from record, which is otherwise also duly supported by the various judicial pronouncements cited by the ld. We rectify the said mistake by re- calling the order passed by the Tribunal dated 13.04.2015 and restore the appeal of the assessee being ITA No. 153/KOL/2012 to its original number. The Registry is directed to fix the same afresh for hearing before the regular Bench in due course. In the result, the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee is allowed.


M. A. No. 89/ KOL/ 2016 (in I.T. A. No. 153/ KOL./2012) Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 1 of 3 IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri P.M. Jagtap, Accountant Member and Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member M.A. No. 89/KOL/2016 (arising out of I.T.A. No. 153/KOL/ 2012) Assessment Year: 2009-2010 Gujarat Hydrocarbons & Power Sez Limited,..........................Applicant Assam House, 52, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata-700 071 [PAN: AADCG 2673 B] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,........ ...........................Respondent Circle-57 (TDS), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700 071 Appearances by: Shri R.N. Bajoria, Sr. Advocate, for assessee Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT, Sr. D.R., for Department Date of concluding hearing : September 23, 2016 Date of pronouncing order : September 23, 2016 O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap : By this Miscellaneous Application, assessee is seeking rectification of mistakes alleged to have crept in order of Tribunal dated 13.04.2015 passed in ITA No. 153/KOL/2012. 2. We have heard arguments of both sides and also perused relevant material available on record. As submitted by ld. counsel for assessee, appeal filed by assessee being ITA No. 153/KOL/2012 has been disposed of by Tribunal vide its order dated 13.04.2015 without taking into consideration decision of Hon ble M . . N o. 8 9 / KO L / 2 0 1 6 ( i n I . T. . N o. 1 5 3 / KO L . / 2 0 1 2 ) Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 2 of 3 Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs.- Prakausali Investments India Pvt. Limited (I.T. Appeal No. 170/2013 and 616/2012) as well as decision of Mumbai Bench of ITAT in case of ITO vs.- Jet Airways India Limited [28 ITR (Trib.) 582 and sub-Rule (2) of Rule 28AA of Income Tax Rules, 1962, which were cited on behalf of assessee and this position clearly evident from record has not been disputed even by ld. D.R. ld. D.R. has also not disputed stand of assessee that such non-consideration of relevant judicial pronouncements and Rule has given rise to mistake apparent from record, which is otherwise also duly supported by various judicial pronouncements cited by ld. counsel for assessee. We, therefore, rectify said mistake by re- calling order passed by Tribunal dated 13.04.2015 and restore appeal of assessee being ITA No. 153/KOL/2012 to its original number. Registry is directed to fix same afresh for hearing before regular Bench in due course. 3. In result, Miscellaneous Application filed by assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in open Court on 23 r d September, 2016 Sd/- Sd/- (N.V. Vasudevan) (P.M. Jagtap) Judicial Member Accountant Member Kolkata, 23 r d day of September, 2016 Copies to : (1) Gujarat Hydrocarbons & Power Sez Limited, Assam House, 52, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata-700 071 (2 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-57 (TDS), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700 071 (3) Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-I, Kolkata (4) Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata (5) Departmental Representative M. A. No. 89/ KOL/ 2016 (in I.T. A. No. 153/ KOL./2012) Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 3 of 3 (6) Guard File By order Assistant Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Laha/Sr. P.S. Gujarat Hydrocarbons & Power Sez Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-57 (TDS), Kolkata
Report Error