Income-tax Officer (Exemption), Faridabad v. St. Luke Educational Society
[Citation -2016-LL-0921-35]

Citation 2016-LL-0921-35
Appellant Name Income-tax Officer (Exemption), Faridabad
Respondent Name St. Luke Educational Society
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/09/2016
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags income tax authorities • educational society • tax effect
Bot Summary: It was a common stand of the parties before the Bench that the tax effect in the present appeal is well below Rs.10 lakh. I find that the appeal has been preferred by the Revenue in violation of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. By the aforesaid circular the pecuniary limit for filing the appeal before the ITAT has been prescribed beyond Rs.10 lakh. Para 3 of the aforesaid Circular has been made applicable vide para 10 retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 2 ITA No.6474/Del/2015 are binding on the authorities, I hold that the appeal is non-maintainable. It is made clear that since the present appeal has not been disposed of on merits, but due to the above reason, this order will not have any judicial precedence. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non-maintainable. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-1: NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.6474/Del/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12) Income Tax Officer (Exemption), vs. St. Luke Educational Society, Faridabad. 180 183, Indira Enclave, Sector 21-D, Faridabad. (PAN : AAFTS7222M) (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri R.K. Raman, FCA REVENUE BY : Shri F.R. Meena, Senior DR Date of Hearing : 29.08.2016 Date of Order : 21.09.2016 ORDER present appeal has been filed by Revenue assailing correctness of order dated 19.08.2015 of CIT(A), Faridabad pertaining to 2011-12 assessment year. 2. It was common stand of parties before Bench that tax effect in present appeal is well below Rs.10 lakh. I have considered material available on record. I find that appeal has been preferred by Revenue in violation of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. By aforesaid circular pecuniary limit for filing appeal before ITAT has been prescribed beyond Rs.10 lakh. Para 3 of aforesaid Circular has been made applicable vide para 10 retrospectively. Considering settled legal precedent that Board s instructions or directions issued to Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of Income Tax Act, 1961 2 ITA No.6474/Del/2015 are binding on authorities, I hold that appeal is non-maintainable. While so holding, it is made clear that since present appeal has not been disposed of on merits, but due to above reason, this order will not have any judicial precedence. Accordingly, appeal of Revenue is dismissed as non-maintainable. 3. In result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on this 21st day of September, 2016. Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER TS/Amit Kumar Copy forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A), Faridabad. 5. DR, ITAT. ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI. Income-tax Officer (Exemption), Faridabad v. St. Luke Educational Society
Report Error