The DCIT, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh v. M/s Creative Capital Services Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2016-LL-0916-145]

Citation 2016-LL-0916-145
Appellant Name The DCIT, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh
Respondent Name M/s Creative Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
Court ITAT-Chandigarh
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 16/09/2016
Assessment Year 2009-10
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: It is observed that in this case the tax effect does not exceed the Monetary Limit of Rs. 10 lakhs. Thus, in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, F.No. Of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, the instant appeal deserves to be treated as withdrawn / not pressed. Vide para 10 of the above instructions, the CBDT has clarified that this instruction will appl y 2 retrospectivel y to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in ITAT. The CBDT has further clarified that the pending appeals before the Tribunal below the specified tax limits i.e. Rs. 10 lakhs may be withdrawn / not pressed by the Revenue. It is also observed that the issue involved in this appeal is not covered by Para 8 of the above instructions. Accordingl y, the appeal filed by the Revenue is treated as withdrawn / not pressed. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.


1 IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCHES, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 607/Chd/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 DC IT, Vs. M/s Creative Capital Services Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-1, New Delhi Chandigarh PAN No. AAACC5540L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Ravi Sarangal, CIT-DR Respondent By : None Date of hearing : 15.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement : 16.09.2016 ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM present appeal has been preferred by Revenue against order of Principal CIT (OSD), Gurgaon dated 31.03.2015 relating to assessment year 2009-10. 2. We have heard Sh. Ravi Sarangal, Ld. CIT-DR. None appeared on behalf of assessee. It is observed that in this case tax effect does not exceed Monetary Limit of Rs. 10 lakhs. Thus, in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt), Government. Of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, instant appeal deserves to be treated as withdrawn / not pressed. Vide para 10 of above instructions, CBDT has clarified that this instruction will appl y 2 retrospectivel y to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in ITAT. CBDT has further clarified that pending appeals before Tribunal below specified tax limits i.e. Rs. 10 lakhs may be withdrawn / not pressed by Revenue. It is also observed that issue involved in this appeal is not covered by Para 8 (Exceptions) of above instructions. Accordingl y, appeal filed by Revenue is treated as withdrawn / not pressed. 3. In result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in Open Court on 16.09.2016 Sd/- Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) (OM PRAKASH KANT) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 16 t h September, 2016 Rkk Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 3 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh v. M/s Creative Capital Services Pvt. Ltd
Report Error