The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle-I(1), Chennai v. M/s Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2016-LL-0915-54]

Citation 2016-LL-0915-54
Appellant Name The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle-I(1), Chennai
Respondent Name M/s Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
Court ITAT-Chennai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 15/09/2016
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags distribution as dividend • accumulated profit
Bot Summary: Shri Shiva Srinivas, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the assessee-company has a common shareholder along with M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. was having accumulated profits for distribution as dividend to the extent of 87,75,665/- as on 31.03.2004 and 1,49,09,446/- as on 31.03.2005. The Ld. D.R. further pointed out that M/s Arjun Global Holdings Limited is a common shareholder in assessee-company as well as in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd., holding more than 20 of the shares. According to the Ld. D.R., the money received by the assessee from M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. from its accumulated profit has to be treated as dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. According to the Ld. D.R., the CIT(Appeals) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer on the ground that the addition, if any, has to be made only in the hands of M/s Arjun Global Holdings Limited and not in the hands of the assessee-company. On the contrary, Shri Mohammed Shaffiq, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that the assessee-company is not a shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. M/s Arjun Global Holdings Limited was holding more than 20 shares in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. as well as in the assessee- company. According to the Ld. counsel, the addition, if any to be made, it has to be made only in the hands of M/s Arjun Global Holdings Limited and definitely not in the hands of the assessee. It is not in dispute that the assessee is not a shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. The assessee-company received a sum of 18,00,000/- from M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. The question arises for consideration is when the assessee-company is not a shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd., whether the receipt of 18,00,000/- can be treated as dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act The claim of the Revenue appears to be that 4 I.T.A. No.2530/Mds/14 M/s Arjun Global Holdings Limited is holding 20 shares in M/s Arjun Technologies Ltd. as well as in the assessee- company the amount of 18,00,000/- received by the assessee-company can be assessed as dividend.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH, CHENNAI BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2530/Mds/2014 Assessment Year : 2005-06 Deputy Commissioner of M/s Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, v. Park View, II floor, New No.94, Company Circle I(1), Old No.85, G.N. Chetty Road, Chennai - 600 034. T. Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. PAN : AAACA 5195 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCIT Respondent by : Shri Mohammed Shaffiq, Advocate Date of Hearing : 28.07.2016 Date of Pronouncement : 15.09.2016 ORDER PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of Revenue is directed against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) I, Chennai, dated 24.06.2014 and pertains to assessment year 2005-06. 2 I.T.A. No.2530/Mds/14 2. only issue arises for consideration is with regard to addition made by Assessing Officer under Section 2(22)(e) of Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. Shri Shiva Srinivas, Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that assessee-company has common shareholder along with M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. was having accumulated profits for distribution as dividend to extent of `87,75,665/- as on 31.03.2004 and `1,49,09,446/- as on 31.03.2005. Ld. D.R. further pointed out that M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited is common shareholder in assessee-company as well as in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd., holding more than 20% of shares. Therefore, according to Ld. D.R., money received by assessee from M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. from its accumulated profit has to be treated as dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of Act. However, according to Ld. D.R., CIT(Appeals) deleted addition made by Assessing Officer on ground that addition, if any, has to be made only in hands of M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited and not in hands of assessee-company. According to Ld. D.R., 3 I.T.A. No.2530/Mds/14 CIT(Appeals) is not justified in deleting addition made by Assessing Officer. 4. On contrary, Shri Mohammed Shaffiq, Ld.counsel for assessee, submitted that assessee-company is not shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited was holding more than 20% shares in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. as well as in assessee- company. Therefore, according to Ld. counsel, addition, if any to be made, it has to be made only in hands of M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited and definitely not in hands of assessee. 5. We have considered rival submissions on either side and perused relevant material available on record. It is not in dispute that assessee is not shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. assessee-company received sum of `18,00,000/- from M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. question arises for consideration is when assessee-company is not shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd., whether receipt of `18,00,000/- can be treated as dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of Act? claim of Revenue appears to be that 4 I.T.A. No.2530/Mds/14 M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited is holding 20% shares in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. as well as in assessee- company, therefore, amount of `18,00,000/- received by assessee-company can be assessed as dividend. This Tribunal is of considered opinion that dividend has to be assessed only in hands of shareholder, for whose benefit money was advanced. In this case, assessee-company received money and it is not shareholder in M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. At best, we may say that money was advanced by M/s Arjun Technologies (India) Ltd. for benefit of its shareholder, namely, M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited. If at all any addition has to be made under Section 2(22)(e) of Act, it has to be made only in hands of M/s Arjun Global Holdings (Mauritius) Limited and definitely not in hands of assessee. Therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with order of lower authority and accordingly same is confirmed. 6. In result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed. 5 I.T.A. No.2530/Mds/14 Order pronounced on 15th September, 2016 at Chennai. sd/- sd/- (D.S. Sunder Singh) (N.R.S. Ganesan) Accountant Member Judicial Member Chennai, th Dated, 15 September, 2016. Kri. Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. (CIT(A)-I, Chennai 4. CIT, Chennai-I, Chennai 5. DR 6. GF. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle-I(1), Chennai v. M/s Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
Report Error