Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2 v. Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2016-LL-0822-120]

Citation 2016-LL-0822-120
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2
Respondent Name Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 22/08/2016
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags condonation of delay
Bot Summary: For c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 22/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Delay condoned. There is a delay of 46 days in filing this special leave petition and in the High Court also there was a delay of 977 days in re-filing the appeal and the appeal filed before the High Court was dismissed by virtue of the impugned order. Signature Not Verified As there was no justifiable reason for condoning the delay, in Digitally signed by our opinion, the High Court had rightly dismissed the appeal and NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2016.08.24 17:42:51 IST Reason: therefore, we also reject this special leave petition. 1 It is deplorable that the petitioner Department was so careless and the appeal was not refiled before the High Court within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay of 977 days in re-filing the appeal. The concerned Authorities shall look into the reasons and find out as to who was responsible for the said delay and deal with the said person in accordance with law for his/her negligence.


ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 15382/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/03/2016 in ITA No. 192/2016 passed by High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PVT. LTD. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 22/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K. Kaul,ASG Mr. Ritesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Bhuvesh,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Bhuvan Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. There is delay of 46 days in filing this special leave petition and in High Court also there was delay of 977 days in re-filing appeal and, therefore, appeal filed before High Court was dismissed by virtue of impugned order. Signature Not Verified As there was no justifiable reason for condoning delay, in Digitally signed by our opinion, High Court had rightly dismissed appeal and NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2016.08.24 17:42:51 IST Reason: therefore, we also reject this special leave petition. 1 It is deplorable that petitioner Department was so careless and appeal was not refiled before High Court within prescribed time limit and there was delay of 977 days in re-filing appeal. concerned Authorities shall look into reasons and find out as to who was responsible for said delay and deal with said person in accordance with law for his/her negligence. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2 v. Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd
Report Error