Commissioner, Belgaum Urban Development Authority v. Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr - 2016-LL-0212-164

Citation	2016-LL-0212-164
Appellant Name	Commissioner, Belgaum Urban Development Authority
Respondent Name	Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr.
Court	SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	12/02/2016
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	In the impugned order, no reasons have been given by the High Court. In view of the said position reflected in the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the respondent was confronted therewith. He submitted that he has no objection if the matters are remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration. The impugned orders passed by the High Court are, accordingly, set aside and all these cases are remitted back to the High Court for deciding the issue afresh by giving detailed reasons after hearing the counsel for the parties. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order. Court Master Court Master Signed order is placed on the file.

IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5062 OF 2011 COMMISSIONER, BELGAUM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... Appellant VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ... Respondents WITH Civil Appeal No. 5063/2011 Civil Appeal No. 5064/2011 Civil Appeal No. 5065/2011 Civil Appeal No. 5066/2011 O R D E R While issuing notice in these appeals, following order was passed on 22.02.2010: - Issue notice as to why matters should not be remitted. In impugned order, no reasons have been given by High Court. Hence, matters need to be sent back. This is prima facie opinion. In view of said position reflected in aforesaid order, learned counsel for respondent was confronted therewith. He submitted that he has no objection if matters are remitted to High Court for fresh consideration. impugned orders passed by High Court are, accordingly, set aside and all these cases are remitted back to High Court for deciding issue afresh by giving detailed reasons after hearing counsel for parties. appeals are disposed of accordingly. Signature Not Verified ........................, J. Digitally signed by [ A.K. SIKRI ] NIDHI AHUJA Date: 2016.02.16 17:20:28 IST Reason: ........................, J. New Delhi; [ ARUN MISHRA ] February 12, 2016. ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 5062/2011 COMMISSIONER, BELG.URBAN DEV.AUTHY Appellant(s) VERSUS C.I.T., & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH C.A. No. 5063/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 5064/2011 C.A. No. 5065/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 5066/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 12/02/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. S. N. Bhat, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. P. S. Narasimha, ASG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. A. K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. A. K. Raina, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following O R D E R appeals are disposed of in terms of signed order. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master [Signed order is placed on file.] Commissioner, Belgaum Urban Development Authority v. Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr

Metadata

Judgment