CIT, Mumbai v. Petroleum India International
[Citation -2016-LL-0122-216]

Citation 2016-LL-0122-216
Appellant Name CIT, Mumbai
Respondent Name Petroleum India International
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 22/01/2016
Judgment View Judgment

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.33283/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/02/2013 in ITA No.6578/2010 passed by High Court of Bombay) CIT MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S PETROLIUM INDIA INTERNATIONAL Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) No.20115/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.33284/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.33285/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.33286/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.33287/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.34401/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.34402/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.37199/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No.9449/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No.10473/2014 (With Office Report) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2016.01.23 SLP(C) No.20114/2012 13:04:25 IST Reason: (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 22/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, SG Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. N. Annapoorani, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Chandambrum, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv. Mr. Sparsh Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Tushal Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ishita F., Adv. Mr. R. Chandrachud,Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. We do not find any merit in Special Leave Petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Interlocutory Application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ashwani Thakur) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar CIT, Mumbai v. Petroleum India International
Report Error