Godriwala Plastics Private Limited/Satish Thourani v. Income tax Officer-Ward No.1 (I) Raipur/Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)/Union of India/State Bank of India
[Citation -2015-LL-1028-14]

Citation 2015-LL-1028-14
Appellant Name Godriwala Plastics Private Limited/Satish Thourani
Respondent Name Income tax Officer-Ward No.1 (I) Raipur/Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)/Union of India/State Bank of India
Court HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 28/10/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags recovery of amount • speaking order
Bot Summary: In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the stay application by speaking order; not to take any coercive steps for recovery of amount of Rs.1,24,58,650/- for which demand has been raised by notice dated 30-3-2015; for quashment of the recovery proceedings; and for directing the respondent No.1 to refund the recovery made from the petitioner No.1's account lying with the State Bank of India, Pachpedi Naka Branch. Admittedly, the petitioners have preferred an appeal against the assessment order dated 30-3-2015, which is pending consideration before the respondent No.2. At this stage, learned Standing counsel for the Income Tax Department would submit that the respondent No.2 shall decide the pending appeal of the petitioners within a period of four weeks. She would also submit that in similar circumstances this Court has passed the order in M/s Sunil Re-Rollers Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India Others1, directing the respondent No.2 to decide the pending appeal of the petitioner and at the same time directing maintenance of status quo with regard to the bank account of the petitioner therein. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioners' pending appeal within a period of four weeks and during pendency of the appeal before the respondent No.2, the respondents shall not withdraw any amount from the bank account of the petitioner.


NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 124 of 2015 1. Godriwala Plastics Private Limited Company Registered Under Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Registered Office At Dhillion Complex Jawahar Nagar Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 Through Its Director Satish Thourani Aged About 43 Years Son Of Mansharam Thourani Resident Of C-85 Tagore Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 2. Satish Thourani S/o Mansharam Thourani Aged About 43 Years R/o C-85 Tagore Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer-Ward No.1 (I) Raipur Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 2. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 3. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance Department Of Revenue, North Block New Delhi Pin Code 110001 4. State Bank Of India Through Its Branch Manager Akanksha Pachpedinaka Branch, Royal Tower, Dhamtari Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code 492001 ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Shashank Dubey, Sr. Adv. with Shri Siddharth Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No.1&2 Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate For Respondent No.3 Shri R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 28/10/2015 1. In this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India petitioners are seeking direction to respondent No.2 to decide stay application by speaking order; not to take any coercive steps for recovery of amount of Rs.1,24,58,650/- for which demand has been raised by notice dated 30-3-2015; for quashment of recovery proceedings; and for directing respondent No.1 to refund recovery made from petitioner No.1's account lying with State Bank of India, Pachpedi Naka Branch. 2. Admittedly, petitioners have preferred appeal against assessment order dated 30-3-2015, which is pending consideration before respondent No.2. 3. At this stage, learned Standing counsel for Income Tax Department would submit that respondent No.2 shall decide pending appeal of petitioners within period of four weeks. She would also submit that in similar circumstances this Court has passed order in M/s Sunil Re-Rollers & Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Others1, directing respondent No.2 to decide pending appeal of petitioner and at same time directing maintenance of status quo with regard to bank account of petitioner therein. 4. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to decide petitioners' pending appeal within period of four weeks and during pendency of appeal before respondent No.2, respondents shall not withdraw any amount from bank account of petitioner. Sd/- Judge Gowri Prashant Kumar Mishra 1 WPT No.108 of 2015 (decided on 28-8-2015) Godriwala Plastics Private Limited/Satish Thourani v. Income tax Officer-Ward No.1 (I) Raipur/Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)/Union of India/State Bank of India
Report Error