The Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0615-68]

Citation 2015-LL-0615-68
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax-4
Respondent Name S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 15/06/2015
Assessment Year 1998-99
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags interest on capital • revenue expenditure • capital borrowed • question of law
Bot Summary: P.C: This Notice of Motion seeks to re call the order dated 25 th July, 2008, dismissing the Appeal, as none had appeared for the Appellant. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support, the order dated 25th July, 2008 is re called and the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause. 2 At the instance of the counsel, the appeal itself is taken up for hearing. 4 This appeal by the revenue raises the following question of law for our consideration: whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,694,09 lacs being the interest on capital borrowed and capitalized in the books of accounts but claimed as revenue expenditure by the assessee. 5 It is an agreed position between the parties that the proposed question stands concluded by the decision of the Apex Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. 6 In view of the above, we find no substantial questions of law arises in this Appeal.


nma-1331-2009 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1331 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1258 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax 4 .. Applicant. V/s. M/s. S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd. .. Respondent. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1258 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax 4 .. Appellant. V/s. M/s. S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate, for Appellant/Applicant. Mr. Ashok Patil i/b. Ms. Aasifa Khan, for Respondent. CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA, & N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : 15th JUNE, 2015. P.C: This Notice of Motion seeks to re call order dated 25 th July, 2008, dismissing Appeal, as none had appeared for Appellant. For reasons stated in affidavit in support, order dated 25th July, 2008 is re called and Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 At instance of counsel, appeal itself is taken up for hearing. S.R.JOSHI 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2020 09:47:46 ::: nma-1331-2009 3 appeal relates to A. Y. 1998 99. 4 This appeal by revenue raises following question of law for our consideration: whether in facts and circumstances of case and in law, ITAT was justified in confirming order of CIT(A) in deleting disallowance of Rs.1,694,09 lacs being interest on capital borrowed and capitalized in books of accounts but claimed as revenue expenditure by assessee? . 5 It is agreed position between parties that proposed question stands concluded by decision of Apex Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. Core Health Care Ltd., 298 ITR 194. 6 In view of above, we find no substantial questions of law arises in this Appeal. 7 Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (N.M.JAMDAR,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) S.R.JOSHI 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2020 09:47:46 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd
Report Error