The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV v. Roha DyeChem Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0609]

Citation 2015-LL-0609
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV
Respondent Name Roha DyeChem Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 09/06/2015
Assessment Year 2003-04
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags question of law


1 2.ITXA1442.13.doc


INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINALCIVILJURISDICTION





INCOMETAXAPPEALNO.1442OF2013




ou
TheCommissionerofIncomeTax,CentralIV Appellant

v/s




C
RohaDyeChemPvt.Ltd. Respondent




h
Mr.ArvindPintofortheappellant.

Nonepresentfortherespondent.
ig
CORAM:M.S.SANKLECHA&
H
N.M.JAMDAR,JJ.

DATED:9THJUNE,2015
y


P .C.:

ba



This appeal by Revenue under Section 260A of the
IncomeTaxAct,1961challengestheorderdated31January2013
om




passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. The
impugnedorderrelatestotheAssessmentYear200304.


2 Theappellanthasformulatedthefollowingquestionoflaw
B




forourconsideration:


Whetheronthefactsandinthecircumstancesofthecase,
theIncomeTaxAppellateTribunalwasjustifiedinlawtodirectthe
Assessing Officer to recompute quantum of deduction under




::: Uploaded on - 11/06/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 08/10/2015 14:39:57 :::
bsb 2 2.ITXA1442.13.doc


Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act without deducting the




rt
deductionunderSection80IBoftheActwhileignoringtheclear
provisionsofSection80IB(9)oftheAct.




ou
3 By impugned order Tribunal has allowed the




C
respondentassessee'sappealbyfollowingthedecisionofthisCourt
in Associate Capsules Pvt. Ltd. v/s Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax, reported in 333 I.T.R. 42 (Bom.). impugned




h
orderalsoreliesuponthefactthatintherespondentassessee'sown
ig
casefortheassessmentyear200102ithadbyanorderdated20
May2011onidenticalissue,allowedrespondentassessee'sappeal
H
byfollowingthedecisionofthiscourtin AssociateCapsulesPvt.
Ltd.(supra).TheRevenuehasnotpointedoutanydistinguishing
featuresinthepresentcasewarrantingaviewdifferentfromthat
y


takenbythisCourtinAssociateCapsulesPvt.Ltd.(supra)andin
ba



theassessee'sowncase.


4 In circumstances, no fault can be found with the
om




impugnedorderoftheTribunalinhavingfollowedthedecisionof
thejurisdictionalCourt.Accordingly,nosubstantialquestionoflaw
arises.Appealdismissed.Noorderastocosts.
B




(N.M.JAMDAR,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)




::: Uploaded on - 11/06/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 08/10/2015 14:39:57 :::
TheCommissionerofIncomeTax,CentralIV v. RohaDyeChemPvt.Ltd
Report Error