C.I.T. W.B. -XI v. Sudhamoy Mondal - 2015-LL-0428-27

Citation	2015-LL-0428-27
Appellant Name	C.I.T. W.B. -XI
Respondent Name	Sudhamoy Mondal
Court	HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	28/04/2015
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	No steps appear to have been taken by the appellant. Without service of the Rule, the appeal appears to have been admitted ex parte on 8th September, 2008. Even after admission of the appeal, no notice of appeal was served. On 17th March, 2015 Mr. Dutta appeared for the appellant when opportunity was given to serve. It was also made clear that in default, consequences are likely to follow. In spite thereof, the appellant has not taken any steps for service. We are, as such, convinced that the appellant is not interested.

ORDER SHEET IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE ITA 118 of 2000 C.I.T. W.B. -XI Versus SUDHAMOY MONDAL BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 28th April, 2015. Mr. M. P. Agarwal, Adv. Court : appeal was presented on 13th March, 2000. On 14th March, 2000 Rule was issued returnable after four weeks. No steps appear to have been taken by appellant. Without service of Rule, appeal appears to have been admitted ex parte on 8th September, 2008. But even after admission of appeal, no notice of appeal was served. As matter of fact, no step whatsoever was taken. On 17th March, 2015 Mr. Dutta appeared for appellant when opportunity was given to serve. It was also made clear that in default, consequences are likely to follow. In spite thereof, appellant has not taken any steps for service. We are, as such, convinced that appellant is not interested. appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) sm C.I.T. W.B. -XI v. Sudhamoy Mondal

Metadata

Judgment