C.I.T. Kolkata-II v. Somdatt Enterprises Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0423-14]

Citation 2015-LL-0423-14
Appellant Name C.I.T. Kolkata-II
Respondent Name Somdatt Enterprises Ltd.
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/04/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags period of limitation • condonation of delay • prescribed period

IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) Original Side Present : Hon ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon ble Justice Arindam Sinha 23rd April, 2015 ITA 178 of 2005 C.I.T. Kolkata II Vs. Somdatt Enterprises Ltd. Mr. M.P. Agarwal, Advocate for appellant Court :- appeal was presented after prescribed period of limitation with separate application for condonation of delay, which was allowed on 14th November, 2005. Thereafter no steps appear to have been taken to have appeal admitted. Since appellant did not take any steps matter was listed under heading For Dismissal and this is third time matter has been listed under heading For Dismissal . Today for first time Mr. Agarwal appeared and prayed for leave to serve which is refused. In circumstances, appeal is dismissed for reasons discussed in our judgment delivered on 1.4.2015 in ITA 156 of 2006 (M/s SICPA India Ltd. vs. CIT, WB-III, Kolkata). (Girish Chandra Gupta, J.) (Arindam Sinha, J.) ANC. C.I.T. Kolkata-II v. Somdatt Enterprises Ltd
Report Error