C.I.T. Kol-I v. R. S. Software India Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0401-21]

Citation 2015-LL-0401-21
Appellant Name C.I.T. Kol-I
Respondent Name R. S. Software India Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/04/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: On 10th June, 2014 when the matter was in the list no one responded. From the report dated 27th June, 2014 filed by the department it transpired that the appellant did not even take out notice of appeal for service. On 29th January, 2015, the matter was in the list when this Court directed the matter to be listed under the heading For Dismissal on 12th February, 2015. On 12th February, 2015, the matter was in the list For Dismissal when no one turned up on behalf of the appellant. On 17th February, 2015, the matter was again in the list under the heading For Dismissal for the second time. Learned 2 advocate appearing for the appellant prayed for leave to serve the notice of appeal. Today, the matter has been listed under the heading For Dismissal.


ORDER SHEET ITA 188 of 2006 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE C.I.T. ,KOL -I Versus R. S. SOFTWARE INDIA LTD. BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 1st April, 2015. Court : appeal was admitted on 17th May, 2006. No step was thereafter taken by appellant to serve notice of appeal. On 10th June, 2014 when matter was in list no one responded. Since there was nothing to show as to whether notice of appeal has been served, this Court directed registry to furnish report. From report dated 27th June, 2014 filed by department it transpired that appellant did not even take out notice of appeal for service. On 29th January, 2015, matter was in list when this Court directed matter to be listed under heading For Dismissal on 12th February, 2015. On 12th February, 2015, matter was in list For Dismissal when no one turned up on behalf of appellant. On 17th February, 2015, matter was again in list under heading For Dismissal for second time. Learned 2 advocate appearing for appellant prayed for leave to serve notice of appeal. Time was granted. In spite thereof, no steps were taken. Today, matter has been listed under heading For Dismissal . No one responded. We have already delivered judgement today in ITA No.156 of 2006 (M/s.Sicpa India Ltd v. CIT, WB-III, Kolkata) indicating reasons as to why in such case appeal has to be dismissed. For same reasons discussed in our said judgement this appeal stands dismissed. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) ssaha AR(CR) C.I.T. Kol-I v. R. S. Software India Ltd
Report Error