C. I. T. Kolkata - II v. Mohta & Sons (P) Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0324-20]

Citation 2015-LL-0324-20
Appellant Name C. I. T. Kolkata - II
Respondent Name Mohta & Sons (P) Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 24/03/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags service of notice
Bot Summary: Directions were issued for filing of paper books within eight weeks and for service of notice of appeal. Obviously, the notice of appeal should have been served within less than eight weeks from the date of admission of the appeal. The department, pursuant to an order of the Court, reported that the appellant did not even take out the notice of appeal for service upon the respondent. On 29th January, 2015, based on the prayer of Mr. Nizamuddin, we granted leave to serve after such a long time on conditions appearing therein. The matter was adjourned from time to time on 12th February, 2015 and 17th February, 2015. 2 Today, Mr. Nizamuddin submitted that he is in a helpless condition. So the conduct of the appellant does not show that they are interested in pursuing the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.


ORDER SHEET ITA 718/2004 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction(income tax) ORIGINAL SIDE C. I. T. KOLKATA - II Versus MOHTA & SONS (P) LTD. BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 24th March, 2015. Mr. M. Nizamuddin, Adv. for appellant. Court : appeal was admitted on 24th January, 2003. Directions were issued for filing of paper books within eight weeks and for service of notice of appeal. Obviously, notice of appeal should have been served within less than eight weeks from date of admission of appeal. But appellant took no steps. department, pursuant to order of Court, reported that appellant did not even take out notice of appeal for service upon respondent. On 29th January, 2015, based on prayer of Mr. Nizamuddin, we granted leave to serve after such long time on conditions appearing therein. In spite thereof, no steps were taken to serve. matter was adjourned from time to time on 12th February, 2015 and 17th February, 2015. 2 Today, Mr. Nizamuddin submitted that he is in helpless condition. So conduct of appellant does not show that they are interested in pursuing appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) tk C. I. T. Kolkata - II v. Mohta & Sons (P) Ltd
Report Error