M/s. Macmet Interactive Technologies (P) Ltd v. C. I. T., W. B. - I, Kolkata
[Citation -2015-LL-0220-42]

Citation 2015-LL-0220-42
Appellant Name M/s. Macmet Interactive Technologies (P) Ltd
Respondent Name C. I. T., W. B. - I, Kolkata
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/02/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: For Appellant/Petitioner : Mr. J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Advocate The Court : On 29th January, 2015, the matter was fixed for peremptory hearing by consent of the parties. On the adjourned day no one appeared for the revenue and the matter has been listed marked For Order. The appellant in this matter is the assessee represented by Mr.Khaitan. He submitted that the assessee is no longer aggrieved because the assessee has already got the relief pursuant to an order dated 27th September, 2004 passed by the learned Tribunal in ITA 506/K/04. He added that the revenue preferred an appeal against that order though the appeal was never admitted and has, according to him, ultimately been dismissed on 29th January, 2015. In that view of the matter, he has instruction not to press the appeal. 2 Needless to mention that if the other appeal is revived or restored, the appellant in this case, shall have liberty to apply for restoration also.


ORDER SHEET ITA 125 OF 2004 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE M/S. MACMET INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES LTD Versus C. I. T., W. B. - I, KOLKATA BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 20th February, 2015. For Appellant/Petitioner : Mr. J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Advocate Court : On 29th January, 2015, matter was fixed for peremptory hearing by consent of parties. On adjourned day no one appeared for revenue and matter has been listed marked For Order . appellant in this matter is assessee represented by Mr.Khaitan. He submitted that assessee is no longer aggrieved because assessee has already got relief pursuant to order dated 27th September, 2004 passed by learned Tribunal in ITA 506/K/04. He added that revenue preferred appeal against that order though appeal was never admitted and has, according to him, ultimately been dismissed on 29th January, 2015. In that view of matter, he has instruction not to press appeal. 2 Needless to mention that if other appeal is revived or restored, appellant in this case, shall have liberty to apply for restoration also. appeal is, thus, disposed of. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) ssaha AR(CR) M/s. Macmet Interactive Technologies (P) Ltd v. C. I. T., W. B. - I, Kolkata
Report Error