C. I. T. Kolkata - XII v. Rashmi Agarwal
[Citation -2015-LL-0220-36]

Citation 2015-LL-0220-36
Appellant Name C. I. T. Kolkata - XII
Respondent Name Rashmi Agarwal
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/02/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags service of notice
Bot Summary: Direction for service of notice of appeal was there but no one carried out that order. The department pursuant to an order dated 4th June, 2014 reported that the revenue-appellant did not take out notice of appeal for service. 2 On 20th January, 2015 the matter was directed to be listed For Dismissal since no one took care on behalf of the appellant. On 27th January, 2015, Mr.Chowdhury, learned Advocate prayed for adjournment for the purpose of serving the notice of appeal. We are, as such, convinced that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.


1 ORDER SHEET ITA NO.837 OF 2004 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction(Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE C. I. T. KOLKATA - XII Versus SMT. RASHMI AGARWAL BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 20th February, 2015. MR.R.K.CHOWDHURY,ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT Court : appeal was admitted on 3rd July, 2006. Direction for service of notice of appeal was there but no one carried out that order. department pursuant to order dated 4th June, 2014 reported that revenue-appellant did not take out notice of appeal for service. 2 On 20th January, 2015 matter was directed to be listed For Dismissal since no one took care on behalf of appellant. On 27th January, 2015, Mr.Chowdhury, learned Advocate prayed for adjournment for purpose of serving notice of appeal. Such prayer was granted. In spite thereof, no further steps were taken. We are, as such, convinced that appellant is not interested in pursuing appeal. appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) sb. C. I. T. Kolkata - XII v. Rashmi Agarwal
Report Error