C. I. T. W. B. 1 v. Hitek Industries (India) Ltd - 2015-LL-0202-36

Citation	2015-LL-0202-36
Appellant Name	C. I. T. W. B. 1
Respondent Name	Hitek Industries (India) Ltd.
Court	HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	02/02/2015
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	The appeal was admitted by an order dated March 28, 2001. The department has furnished a report disclosing that no steps were taken by the revenue to have the notice of appeal served. From the order sheet it appears that on 13th June, 2014 when the matter was called on, no body appeared on behalf of the revenue. From the endorsement on the paper book it appears that the matter appeared in the list on 11th September, 2014 and again on 16th September, 2014. Obviously no one appeared and that is why there was no order passed and the matter was simply adjourned. Today, the matter has been listed under the heading for dismissal , but no one appeared on behalf of the revenue. We are, in the circumstances, convinced that the revenue is not interested to press the appeal.

ORDER SHEET IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE ITA No. 45 of 2001 C. I. T. W. B. 1 Versus HITEK INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 2nd February, 2015. appeal was admitted by order dated March 28, 2001. department has furnished report disclosing that no steps were taken by revenue to have notice of appeal served. They did not even collect notice of appeal from department. From order sheet it appears that on 13th June, 2014 when matter was called on, no body appeared on behalf of revenue. From endorsement on paper book it appears that matter appeared in list on 11th September, 2014 and again on 16th September, 2014. But obviously no one appeared and that is why there was no order passed and matter was simply adjourned. Today, matter has been listed under heading for dismissal , but no one appeared on behalf of revenue. We are, in circumstances, convinced that revenue is not interested to press appeal. appeal is, therefore, dismissed. [ GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.] [ ARINDAM SINHA, J.] sm C. I. T. W. B. 1 v. Hitek Industries (India) Ltd

Metadata

Judgment