Azimganj Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Inocme-tax-III, Kolkata
[Citation -2015-LL-0128-20]

Citation 2015-LL-0128-20
Appellant Name Azimganj Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name Commissioner of Inocme-tax-III, Kolkata
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 28/01/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags income from house property • rental income • letting out
Bot Summary: The Court : The following question of law was formulated when the appeal, was admitted. Whether the Tribunal substantially erred in law in holding that the rental income derived by the appellant from letting out unsold flats was assessable under the head business income and not under the head income from house property Mr. Sen, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant drew our attention to a judgment in the assessee s own case, Azimganj Estates Pvt. Ltd.-Vs- CIT reported in 352 ITR 82 wherein the Division Bench held as follows: The subject matter of exploitation being unsold flats still owned by the assessee; the Commissioner rightly concluded that 2 the income therefrom should be treated as income from house property by way of letting it out. Subsequently, in another case of the same assessee, another Bench of this Court to which one of us was a party also held in favour of the assessee following the earlier judgment reported in 352 ITR 82. The same is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee after hearing the learned Advocates.


ORDER SHEET IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA No. 64 of 2009 AZIMGANJ ESTATES PVT.LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, KOLKATA BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 28th January, 2015. Mr.Ananda Sen, Mr.B.Mal, Adv. Mr.M.P.Agarwal, Adv. Ms.M.Bhargava, Adv. Court : following question of law was formulated when appeal, was admitted. Whether Tribunal substantially erred in law in holding that rental income derived by appellant from letting out unsold flats was assessable under head business income and not under head income from house property ? Mr. Sen, learned Advocate appearing for appellant drew our attention to judgment in assessee s own case, Azimganj Estates Pvt. Ltd.-Vs- CIT reported in (2013) 352 ITR 82 (Cal) wherein Division Bench held as follows: subject matter of exploitation being unsold flats still owned by assessee; Commissioner (Appeals) rightly concluded that 2 income therefrom should be treated as income from house property by way of letting it out. Subsequently, in another case of same assessee, another Bench of this Court to which one of us was party also held in favour of assessee following earlier judgment reported in 352 ITR 82. identical question is involved in this appeal. same is answered in affirmative and in favour of assessee after hearing learned Advocates. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) km Azimganj Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Inocme-tax-III, Kolkata
Report Error