Ge Helathcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Assitant CIT, Circle-12(1) - 2015-LL-0116-123

Citation	2015-LL-0116-123
Appellant Name	Ge Helathcare Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name	Assitant CIT, Circle-12(1)
Court	HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	16/01/2015
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	rectification order
Bot Summary:	The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5212/Del./2011. It has been urged that several questions of law arise in these proceedings. In the previous orders of the Court dated 09.09.2003, 26.11.2003 and subsequent orders, show that adjournments were sought and granted on the ground that an application under Section 254(2) seeking rectification of certain aspect in the impugned order is pending consideration. Since, the said proceedings have not yet terminated, we are of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in continuing to retain the present appeal on the record. The appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to approach this Court in a comprehensive petition or an appeal in accordance with law, urging all the questions sought to be raised in the present appeal. In case any or some of the grievances survive in the light of the rectification order, this would be in addition to the grievance, if any, that may arise due to the rectification order itself. The appeal is consequently dismissed but with liberty as mentioned above.

IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 103/2013 GE HELATHCARE PVT LTD Appellant Through Mr.R.Satish Kumar, Adv. versus ASSITANT CIT, CIRCLE 12(1) Respondent Through None. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER 16.01.2015 1. Mr. Sawhney is not well. petitioner is aggrieved by order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.5212/Del./2011. It has been urged that several questions of law arise in these proceedings. In previous orders of Court dated 09.09.2003, 26.11.2003 and subsequent orders, show that adjournments were sought and granted on ground that application under Section 254(2) seeking rectification of certain aspect in impugned order is pending consideration. 2. Since, said proceedings have not yet terminated, we are of opinion that no useful purpose would be served in continuing to retain present appeal on record. 3. appeal is disposed of with liberty to appellant to approach this Court in comprehensive petition or appeal in accordance with law, urging all questions sought to be raised in present appeal. In case any or some of grievances survive in light of rectification order, this would be in addition to grievance, if any, that may arise due to rectification order itself. 4. appeal is consequently dismissed but with liberty as mentioned above. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J R.K.GAUBA, J JANUARY 16, 2015 mr $ 15and Ge Helathcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Assitant CIT, Circle-12(1)

Metadata

Judgment