ITXA.230.2013.3.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 230 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income tax 19 } Appellant versus Suresh Babu Ganpat Malge } Respondent None for Appellant. Dr. K. Shivaram Senior Advocate with Ms. Neelam Jadhav for Respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & S.P.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 9, 2015 P.C. : This Appeal has been filed on 31st December, 2012/31st January, 2013. Department has not instructed Advocate, who filed Appeal Mr. D. K. Kamwal, to argue Appeal. arguing Counsel has not been engaged by Department till date. We think that time from filing of Appeal till today was enough to engage and brief such arguing Counsel. None of arguing Counsel present in Court are representing and willing to argue this case. matter has been listed twice previously. Department/Revenue having failed to make any such arrangement and Mr. Kamwal is absent that we have proceeded to dismiss Appeal for want of prosecution. (S.P.DESHMUKH, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Page 1 of 1 J.V.Salunke,PA ::: Uploaded on - 13/01/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 20/04/2020 12:06:04 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax-19 v. Suresh Babu Ganpat Malge