Director of Income-tax (IT)-II v. Set Satellite(Singapore) PTE. Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-1217-55]

Citation 2014-LL-1217-55
Appellant Name Director of Income-tax (IT)-II
Respondent Name Set Satellite(Singapore) PTE. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/12/2014
Assessment Year 2001-02
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags substantial question of law


1/2 itxa-11-13.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11 OF 2013 Director of Income Tax (IT)-II ...Appellant v/s. Set Satellite(Singapore) PTE. Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.Tejveer Singh for Appellant. Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Nishant Thakker and Ms.Megha Bansal i/b PDS Legal for Respondent. ... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 17 DECEMBER 2014 P.C. This Appeal of Revenue challenges order passed on 20 January 2012. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Mumbai, was considering Income Tax Appeal No.3445/Mum/2008 for Assessment Year 2001-02. 2. This very Assessee was before this Court as Respondent in Income Tax Appeal No.2097 of 2011. It was also before this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1392 of 2011, decided on 18 March 2014. 3. One question at pages 4 & 5 of Paper Book is identical to one raised in Income Tax Appeal No.2097 of 2011. Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us Uday Kambli 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 19/12/2014 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2020 14:06:07 ::: 2/2 itxa-11-13.doc (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) was party, dismissed that Appeal on 22 April 2014 and following judgment of this Court. 4. It is conceded by Mr.Tejveer Singh that facts and circumstances and equally Assessee are identical. 5. In view of this concession, this Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is dismissed. No costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) Uday Kambli 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 19/12/2014 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2020 14:06:07 ::: Director of Income-tax (IT)-II v. Set Satellite(Singapore) PTE. Ltd
Report Error