Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. M/s. Doubledot Finance Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-1210-5]

Citation 2014-LL-1210-5
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-4
Respondent Name M/s. Doubledot Finance Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 10/12/2014
Assessment Year 1999-00
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags substantial question law
Bot Summary: The Assessment Year under y consideration is 1999-2000. The only question was whether the Commissioner erred om in exercising his powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, so as to hold that the Assessing Officer's order is erroneous and in so far as it prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The B Tribunal in dismissing the Revenue's Appeal placed reliance upon its earlier order in the case of this very Assessee delivered on 14 December 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.2581/M/2008. That Uday Kambli 1/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 16:13:04 ::: 2/2 itxa-1450-12.doc order was challenged by the Revenue before this Court. The rt Revenue's Appeal was dismissed on 21 January 2013 by the ou Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.935 of 2011. Mr.Malhotra has fairly placed a copy of this order before us. Following the Division Bench order, we proceed to hold that the C identical question raised is not substantial question of law.


1/2 itxa-1450-12.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION rt INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1450 OF 2012 ou Commissioner of Income Tax-4 ...Appellant v/s. M/s.Doubledot Finance Ltd. ...Respondent C Mr.A.R.Malhotra with Mr.N.M.Kazi for Appellant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & h A.A. SAYED, JJ. P.C. ig DATED : 10 DECEMBER 2014 H This Appeal challenges order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench dated 14 March 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.3966/Mum/2008. Assessment Year under y consideration is 1999-2000. ba 2. only question was whether Commissioner erred om in exercising his powers under section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961, so as to hold that Assessing Officer's order is erroneous and in so far as it prejudicial to interest of Revenue. B Tribunal in dismissing Revenue's Appeal placed reliance upon its earlier order in case of this very Assessee delivered on 14 December 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.2581/M/2008. That Uday Kambli 1/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 16:13:04 ::: 2/2 itxa-1450-12.doc order was challenged by Revenue before this Court. But rt Revenue's Appeal was dismissed on 21 January 2013 by ou Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.935 of 2011. Mr.Malhotra has fairly placed copy of this order before us. Following Division Bench order, we proceed to hold that C identical question raised is not substantial question of law. Appeal is devoid of merits and is dismissed. No costs. h (A.A. SAYED, J.) ig (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) H y ba om B Uday Kambli 2/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 16:13:04 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. M/s. Doubledot Finance Ltd
Report Error