Commissioner of Income-tax-III v. Shripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan
[Citation -2014-LL-1115-4]

Citation 2014-LL-1115-4
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-III
Respondent Name Shripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 15/11/2014
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 15, 2014 P.C. : These six Appeals involve questions and identical to the one covered and dealt with in Income Tax Appeal Nos. 36 of 2012, 37 of 2012 and 39 of 2012, which came to be dismissed by this Court on 10th June, 2014. The Division Bench, to which one of us was a party was dealing with identical situation and identical controversy and questions. 2012 5.doc this order and because no distinguishing features have been pointed out. In these circumstances, each one of these Appeals do not raise any substantial question of law. We have also taken the same view in Income Tax Appeal No. 854 of 2012 decided on 12 th September, 2014 and Income Tax Appeal No. 1426 of 2012 and connected matters on 31st October, 2014.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1527 OF 2012 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1589 OF 2012 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2013 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2013 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2013 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax III } Appellant versus Shripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan } Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for Appellant. Mr. Mandar Vaidya for Respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 15, 2014 P.C. : These six Appeals involve questions and identical to one covered and dealt with in Income Tax Appeal Nos. 36 of 2012, 37 of 2012 and 39 of 2012, which came to be dismissed by this Court on 10th June, 2014. Division Bench, to which one of us (S. C. Dharmathikari, J.) was party was dealing with identical situation and identical controversy and questions. We cannot deviate or depart from Page 1 of 2 J.V.Salunke,PA ::: Uploaded on - 18/11/2014 ::: Downloaded on - 16/04/2020 12:17:49 ::: ITXA.1527.2012+5.doc this order and because no distinguishing features have been pointed out. In these circumstances, each one of these Appeals do not raise any substantial question of law. These are dismissed. We have also taken same view in Income Tax Appeal No. 854 of 2012 decided on 12 th September, 2014 and Income Tax Appeal No. 1426 of 2012 and connected matters on 31st October, 2014. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Page 2 of 2 J.V.Salunke,PA Uploaded on - 18/11/2014 Downloaded on - 16/04/2020 12:17:49 Commissioner of Income-tax-III v. Shripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan
Report Error