The Commissioner of Income-tax­-25 v. M/s. Ashirwad Developers
[Citation -2014-LL-1001-25]

Citation 2014-LL-1001-25
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax­-25
Respondent Name M/s. Ashirwad Developers
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/10/2014
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags substantial question law
Bot Summary: H .......... igCORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. K. MENON, JJ. H DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: y 1 The two questions of law which arise out of the order passed by the ba Tribunal dated 30th June, 2011 relating to assessment year 2005 06 are formulated at page 4 and 5 of the paper book. Om 2 When the Appeal was placed for admission, it was fairly stated that the issues are answered by this Court in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. B Brahma Associates reported in 333 ITR 289 and the two Appeals which have been decided by a common judgment and order in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of 1/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 11:02:32 ::: 2 5.itxa963. 12 Income Tax 16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and in Income Tax rt Appeal No.308 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai V/s. M/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd. ou 3 In view thereof and the questions having been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee, the present Appeal does not raise C any substantial question of law.


*1* 5.itxa963.12 sbw IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY rt ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.963 OF 2012 ou Commissioner of Income Tax 25 ..Appellant Versus M/s. Ashirwad Developers ..Respondent C ........... Mr. Tejveer Singh for Appellant. Mr. A. K. Jasani for Respondent. h ........... igCORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. K. MENON, JJ. H DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: y 1] two questions of law which arise out of order passed by ba Tribunal dated 30th June, 2011 relating to assessment year 2005 06 are formulated at page 4 and 5 of paper book. om 2] When Appeal was placed for admission, it was fairly stated that issues are answered by this Court in favour of Assessee and against Revenue in case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. B Brahma Associates reported in (2011) 333 ITR 289 and two Appeals which have been decided by common judgment and order in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 in case of Commissioner of 1/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 11:02:32 ::: *2* 5.itxa963.12 Income Tax 16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and in Income Tax rt Appeal No.308 of 2012 in case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai V/s. M/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd. ou 3] In view thereof and questions having been answered against Revenue and in favour of Assessee, present Appeal does not raise C any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. h (A. K. MENON, J.) ig (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) H y ba wadhwa om B 2/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 11:02:32 ::: The Commissioner of Income-tax­-25 v. M/s. Ashirwad Developer
Report Error