Sabyasachi Dasgupta v. C.I.T. XIX, Kolkata - 2014-LL-0925-47

Citation	2014-LL-0925-47
Appellant Name	Sabyasachi Dasgupta
Respondent Name	C.I.T. XIX, Kolkata
Court	HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	25/09/2014
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	The Court : Copy of the notice dated 16.09.2014, addressed by Sutapa Roy Chowdhury, learned Advocate-on-Record for the appellant, to Mr. S. S. Sarkar, learned Central Government Advocate, Calcutta, filed in Court today be kept on record. It is submitted by Mr. R. N. Dutta, learned Advocate for the appellant, that there is omission in the order dated 21st August, 2014. Submission is that the matter has been remanded before the Assessing Officer, however the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 26th May, 2006 had not been set aside. 2 The order impugned is set aside and this addition to be read in that order dated 21st August, 2014.

ORDER SHEET ITA No.370 of 2006 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE SABYASACHI DASGUPTA Versus C.I.T. XIX KOL BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 25th September, 2014. Appearance: Mr. R. N. Dutta, Adv. Ms. Sutapa Roy Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. P. S. Prusty, Adv. Court : Copy of notice dated 16.09.2014, addressed by Sutapa Roy Chowdhury, learned Advocate-on-Record for appellant, to Mr. S. S. Sarkar, learned Central Government Advocate, Calcutta, filed in Court today be kept on record. It is submitted by Mr. R. N. Dutta, learned Advocate for appellant, that there is omission in order dated 21st August, 2014. Submission is that matter has been remanded before Assessing Officer, however impugned order of Tribunal dated 26th May, 2006 had not been set aside. Mr. P. S. Prusty, learned Central Government Advocate, submits that submission made is correct. 2 order impugned is set aside and this addition to be read in that order dated 21st August, 2014. (SOUMITRA PAL, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) cs. Sabyasachi Dasgupta v. C.I.T. XIX, Kolkata

Metadata

Judgment