CIT v. CRM Services India Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-0923-50]

Citation 2014-LL-0923-50
Appellant Name CIT
Respondent Name CRM Services India Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/09/2014
Judgment View Judgment


7/14/2020 delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=191787&yr=2014 IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No. 618/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Advocate. versus CRM SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate. ITA 225/2014 CRM SERVICES INDIA (P) LTD . ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Advocate. CORAM: delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=191787&yr=2014 1/2 7/14/2020 delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=191787&yr=2014 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER 23.09.2014 In terms of last order, Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel has obtained instructions and it is stated that ITA Nos. 225/2014 and 618/2012, which are cross appeals, have become infructuous as upon remand, fresh order has been passed and in view of findings recorded after adjustment of (+) (-) 5% as stipulated in proviso to Section 92CA(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 even if we do take into consideration lease rental, difference would be within permissible margin. These appeals are accordingly disposed of as infructuous. SANJIV KHANNA, J. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 VKR $ 15and16. delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=191787&yr=2014 2/2 CIT v. CRM Services India Pvt. Ltd
Report Error