C.I.T., Kanpur v. M/s. Rohtas Projects Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-0702-48]

Citation 2014-LL-0702-48
Appellant Name C.I.T., Kanpur
Respondent Name M/s. Rohtas Projects Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 02/07/2014
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: For c/delay in filing SLP) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 9132/2014 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 10133/2014 Date : 02/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, for the petitioners. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rajesh Dham Delay in filing special leave petitions is condoned. Date: 2014.07.02 16:38:18 IST Reason: Special leave petitions are dismissed.


ITEM NOS.16 + 47 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...... CC No(s). 7969/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/12/2013 in ITA 466/2010 passed by High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) C.I.T.,KANPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S.ROHTAS PROJECTS LTD. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) WITH S.L.P.(C)...[CC No. 9132/2014] (With prayer for and c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...[CC No. 10133/2014] (With prayer for and c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 02/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri Lal, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, for petitioners. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rajesh Dham Delay in filing special leave petitions is condoned. Date: 2014.07.02 16:38:18 IST Reason: Special leave petitions are dismissed. (RAJESH DHAM) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER C.I.T., Kanpur v. M/s. Rohtas Projects Ltd
Report Error