C.I.T.& Anr. v. American Data Solutions (I) Pvt.Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-0702-46]

Citation 2014-LL-0702-46
Appellant Name C.I.T.& Anr.
Respondent Name American Data Solutions (I) Pvt.Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 02/07/2014
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: For c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P. No......CC No(s). For c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, for the petitioners. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rajesh Dham Date: 2014.07.02 16:38:24 IST Reason: Delay is condoned in filing the special leave petitions. Having regard to the peculiar facts of these cases, 2 we are satisfied that these are not fit cases for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.


1 ITEM NOS.10 + 46 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...... CC No(s). 7931/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/12/2013 in ITA 232/2008 passed by High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) C.I.T.& ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS AMERICAN DATA SOLUTIONS (I)PVT.LTD. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P. (Civil) No......[CC No(s). 9849/2014) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Shipra Ghose, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, for petitioners. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rajesh Dham Date: 2014.07.02 16:38:24 IST Reason: Delay is condoned in filing special leave petitions. Having regard to peculiar facts of these cases, 2 we are satisfied that these are not fit cases for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of Constitution of India. Special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly. (RAJESH DHAM) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER C.I.T.& Anr. v. American Data Solutions (I) Pvt.Ltd
Report Error