1 ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29416/2012 (From judgement and order dated 10/03/2010 as corrected on dated 18/03/2010 in WP No.149/2010 of HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK) CHIEF,C.I.T,BHUBANESHWAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS KAMAL JEET SINGH AHLUWALIA Respondent(s) (I.A. No. 2-Appln. for placing on record addl. documents) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 08/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Banerji, ASG Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. rr.1 Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Adv. Mr. Akshat Anand, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv Mr. Vipul Jai, Adv. Mr.P.S.Sudheer ,Adv Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Kaushik, Adv. 2 UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1(applicant in I.A. No. 2) states that matter was referred to Income Tax Settlement Commission (IT & WT) for certain reliefs as envisaged under Income Tax Act, 1961. He further submits that Settlement Commission had passed appropriate orders and therefore petition has become infructuous. In view of statement so made by learned counsel for respondent No. 1, in our opinion, nothing survives in this special leave petition for our consideration and decision. Therefore, special leave petition is disposed of as having infructuous. However, we reserve liberty to petitioner(s) to approach this Court once over again, if, for any reason submission of respondent No. 1 (applicant in I.A. No. 2) is incorrect. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar Chief C.I.T, Bhubaneshwar & Ors. v. Kamal Jeet Singh Ahluwalia