Merit Mangnum Construction v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax & ors
[Citation -2013-LL-1129-256]

Citation 2013-LL-1129-256
Appellant Name Merit Mangnum Construction
Respondent Name Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax & ors.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 29/11/2013
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: In view of the consensus arrived at among the parties, the impugned order dated 7th March, 2013 passed by the High Court of judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 413 of 2013 is quashed and set aside. The orders dated 31.01.2013 and 30.03.2013 passed by Asst. As requested, the petitioner-assessee shall file additional objections before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer within two weeks from today. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer shall consider the objections which had already been filed as well as the additional objections, which might be filed by the petitioner-assesee, and decide the objections by passing a speaking order. With the above observations and directions, the Civil Appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Leave granted. The Civil Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.


IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10756 OF 2013 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION NO.17140 OF 2013] MERIT MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION Appellant(s) VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted. Heard learned counsel appearing for parties at some length. In view of consensus arrived at among parties, impugned order dated 7th March, 2013 passed by High Court of judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 413 of 2013 is quashed and set aside. orders dated 31.01.2013 and 30.03.2013 passed by Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax-21(2), Mumbai are also quashed and set aside. As requested, petitioner-assessee shall file additional objections before jurisdictional Assessing Officer within two weeks from today. jurisdictional Assessing Officer shall consider objections which had already been filed as well as additional objections, which might be filed by petitioner-assesee, and decide objections by passing speaking order. With above observations and directions, Civil Appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. .......................J. [ANIL R. DAVE ] .......................J. [DIPAK MISRA] New Delhi; November 29, 2013. ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17140/2013 (From judgement and order dated 07/03/2013 in WP No.413/2013 of HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) MERIT MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION Petitioner(s) VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &OR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 29/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nishant Thakker, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. for Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Leave granted. Civil Appeal is disposed of in terms of signed order. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) | |Sr. P.A. | |Court Master | (Signed order is placed on file) Merit Mangnum Construction v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax & or
Report Error