CIT, Mumbai-10, Mumbai v. M/s. Maharashtra State Elect. Dist. Co. Ltd
[Citation -2013-LL-1025-173]

Citation 2013-LL-1025-173
Appellant Name CIT, Mumbai-10, Mumbai
Respondent Name M/s. Maharashtra State Elect. Dist. Co. Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/10/2013
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Delay condoned. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that certain questions which had been referred to, have not been dealt with by the High Court and we are of the view that the petitioner should approach the High Court with a review application stating the above facts. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file Review Petition in the High Court. Needless to say, if the Review Petition is filed before the High Court, it will be considered by the High Court in accordance with law and in case, the Review Application is rejected by the High Court, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court even for challenging the order which has been challenged in this petition.


ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 18599/2013 (From judgement and order dated 25/02/2013 in ITA No.149/2013, of HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) CIT MUMBAI-10, MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECT.DIST.CO.LTD Respondent(s) (With I.A. No. 1 - appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date: 25/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, ASG Mr. Vidit Gupta, Adv. Ms. Harleen Singh, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. Learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner has submitted that certain questions which had been referred to, have not been dealt with by High Court and, therefore, we are of view that petitioner should approach High Court with review application stating above facts. Special Leave Petition is, accordingly disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file Review Petition in High Court. Needless to say, if Review Petition is filed before High Court, it will be considered by High Court in accordance with law and in case, Review Application is rejected by High Court, it will be open to petitioner to approach this Court even for challenging order which has been challenged in this petition. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) | |Sr. P.A. | |Court Master | CIT, Mumbai-10, Mumbai v. M/s. Maharashtra State Elect. Dist. Co. Ltd
Report Error