M/s Streamline Finvest Tr.Partner v. Chief Commr.of I.T, Bangalore -II
[Citation -2013-LL-1018-104]

Citation 2013-LL-1018-104
Appellant Name M/s Streamline Finvest Tr.Partner
Respondent Name Chief Commr.of I.T, Bangalore -II
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 18/10/2013
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the special leave petition there is some development with regard to the measurement of the land. In view of the development, he seeks permission to withdraw the special leave petition to enable the petitioner to move before the High Court by filing a review application. He is so permitted without any liberty to challenge the impugned order in question. The special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.


ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.27568-27569/2012 (From judgement and order dated 21/03/2012 in WA No.139/2006,WA No.4362/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE) M/S STREAMLINE FINVEST TR.PARTNER Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHIEF COMMR.OF I.T BANGALORE -II. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing typed copy of annexures) Date: 18/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA For Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rajani K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Ram Kumar, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shalini Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of special leave petition there is some development with regard to measurement of land. In view of development, he seeks permission to withdraw special leave petition to enable petitioner to move before High Court by filing review application. He is so permitted without any liberty to challenge impugned order in question. special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. [RAJNI MUKHI] [USHA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER M/s Streamline Finvest Tr.Partner v. Chief Commr.of I.T, Bangalore -II
Report Error