Spirax Marshall Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl. Range-3, Pune
[Citation -2005-LL-0118-11]

Citation 2005-LL-0118-11
Appellant Name Spirax Marshall Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl. Range-3, Pune
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 18/01/2005
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: The learned Senior Counsel for Respondent waives service. Perused order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 11.9.2003. Mr.Dastur, the learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant has pointed out that the Tribunal has not considered the method of accounting that has been followed by the Appellant for the last several years which was accepted by the Revenue. He also brought to our notice that two important judgments viz. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we quash and set aside the impugned order dated 11.9.2003 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the matter is ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2020 14:07:11 ::: remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, to decide the same afresh on all issues, as expeditiously as possible. Appeal is allowed accordingly, however with no order as to costs.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.273 OF 2004 Spirax Marshall Pvt.Ltd. .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax Spl.Range-3, Pune - 411 034. .. Respondent Mr.S.E.Dastur, Senior Counsel with Mr.A.K.Jasani for Appellant. for Respondents. Mr.R.V.Desai, Senior Counsel with Mr.P.Kapoor for Respondent. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 18.01.2005. P.C.: 1. Appeal is admitted. learned Senior Counsel for Respondent waives service. By consent taken up for final hearing. Heard learned Counsel for parties. Perused order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 11.9.2003. Mr.Dastur, learned Senior Counsel for Appellant has pointed out that Tribunal has not considered method of accounting that has been followed by Appellant for last several years which was accepted by Revenue. He also brought to our notice that two important judgments viz.CIT CIT V/s Simplex Concrete Pipes - 179 ITR 8 and Anup Engineering Ltd.V/s.CIT-247 ITR 457, were not considered by Tribunal, though cited before it. 2. Under aforesaid facts and circumstances, we quash and set aside impugned order dated 11.9.2003 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and matter is ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2020 14:07:11 ::: remanded back to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, to decide same afresh on all issues, as expeditiously as possible. Appeal is allowed accordingly, however with no order as to costs. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2020 14:07:11 ::: Spirax Marshall Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl. Range-3, Pune
Report Error