RAMESH C. SHAH v. FORUTH INCOME TAX OFFICER
[Citation -1985-LL-0226-7]

Citation 1985-LL-0226-7
Appellant Name RAMESH C. SHAH
Respondent Name FORUTH INCOME TAX OFFICER
Court ITAT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 26/02/1985
Assessment Year 1979-80
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags levy of interest • usa
Bot Summary: The relevant facts are that the assessee claimed before the ITO that he h a s received Rs. 9,500 as gifts from his uncle and brother who are staying abroad. When they came to India, they gifted this amount. In support of these, the assessee filed confirmatory letter from K. H. Sheth, uncle of the assessee, having made gift of Rs. 5,000 and another confirmatory letter from his brother Sri Prafull C. Sheth having gifted Rs. 5,000. The ITO did not agree with the claim of the assessee. In appeal, the view taken by the ITO was confirmed by the AAC. Being aggrieved, the assessee came in appeal before us. Representative for the assessee Sri Anand Mehta, submitted that the donors are the near relatives of the assessee and the assessee has lost his father. For such gifts, of Rs. 5,000 and Rs. 4,500, a person from USA is not expected to come and appear before the ITO for examination. Considering the facts especially the financial position of the donors and their relations with the assessee, we accept the claim of the assessee that the gifts are given by the relative.


This is appeal by assessee against order of AAC dt. 17th Dec., 1982. assessment year involved is 1979-80. main issue for our consideration in this appeal is whether AAC has erred in confirming addition of Rs. 9,500 in respect of 2 cash gifts treating them as income from undisclosed sources. relevant facts are that assessee claimed before ITO that he h s received Rs. 9,500 as gifts from his uncle and brother who are staying abroad. When they came to India, they gifted this amount. Rs. 4,500 was gifted by his brother and Rs. 5,000 was gifted by his uncle. In support of these, assessee filed confirmatory letter from K. H. Sheth, uncle of assessee, having made gift of Rs. 5,000 and another confirmatory letter from his brother Sri Prafull C. Sheth having gifted Rs. 5,000. ITO did not agree with claim of assessee. According to him. confirmatory letters filed are undated and persons are not available for examination. In appeal, view taken by ITO was confirmed by AAC. Being aggrieved, assessee came in appeal before us. ld. Representative for assessee Sri Anand Mehta, submitted that donors are near relatives of assessee and assessee has lost his father. That is why, they are more considerate; they brought travellers cheque, encashed them in India and paid gift in form of cash. In such cases what can be evidences. relatives are not doubted by ITO considering financial position and relation with donors. There is no question of doubting genuineness of gifts. On other hand, ld. Departmental Representative, Sri Prem Kumar relied on order of authorities below. We have heard rival submissions and considered material on record. When relatives of assessee who are donors are not doubted and confirmatory letters of donor are there, these letters cannot be ignored merely because they are not dated. Moreover, for such gifts, of Rs. 5,000 and Rs. 4,500, person from USA is not expected to come and appear before ITO for examination. Considering facts especially financial position of donors and their relations with assessee, we accept claim of assessee that gifts are given by relative. other issue relating to interest under ss. 139 (B) and 217 (1A) is consequential. When we have accepted that gifts are genuine and no addition is warranted, question of levy of interest does not arise. In result, appeal is allowed. *** RAMESH C. SHAH v. FORUTH INCOME TAX OFFICER
Report Error